Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To subscribe by email, enter your address:

About Us

www.clpblog.org

The contributors to this blog are a diverse group of lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. Although the blog is hosted by Public Citizen's Consumer Justice Project, the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions with which they are affiliated. To view the blog's statement of policies, please click here.

Coordinators

Other Contributors

« CL&P Roundup | Main | Caveat Proletarius: The ALEC Model Consumer Protection Law »

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

Class Action Fairness Act: More on the New FJC Data

    by Brian Wolfman

    I am surprised that, as noted in Deepak Gupta's recent post, Tom Willging is surprised that The Federal Judicial Center (FJC) preliminary data on the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) show that CAFA had its intended effect of moving class actions of the kind previously litigated in state court to federal court (either via original filing or removal).  That result seemed inevitable because, under CAFA, in most substantial consumer class actions where there’s a diverse defendant, there’s nothing a plaintiff can do to keep the case out of federal court.  So, I wouldn't have expected it to take much time for the law to kick in; one would expect to see its effect almost immediately.  The more important question, I think, is whether the law will affect case outcomes (class certification, settlements, other legal rulings). On that question, it’s too early to tell, and the empirical evidence will be tougher to collect and evaluate.  It seems like difficult research, among other reasons, because seemingly there will be no significant group of similar post-CAFA state court cases to which the post-CAFA federal cases can be compared.  I look forward to seeing what Tom and his colleagues at the FJC produce in that regard.

    The FJC CAFA data remind me of something regarding the reaction of class action lawyers and academics to CAFA.  Because CAFA litigation has naturally revolved around defining CAFA’s so-called “exceptions” to federal jurisdiction (and some ancillary questions, such as defining the time for taking a CAFA permissive appeal), so has the legal commentary on CAFA.  Journal articles and seminars abound on these topics.  That phenomenon has, I think, created the illusion that, under CAFA, there is a broad range of cases where there will be legitimate disputes about CAFA’s meaning and coverage.  That’s really not so.  The litigation is on the margins.  The great majority of large consumer class actions, whether national or single-state, will now be litigated in federal court, just as CAFA’s proponents envisioned.  At the least, class action defendants will have the federal court option.  And since all the defendants desired from CAFA was forum choice, they've gotten what they wanted.  Again, whether they get the substantive results that they wanted remains to be seen.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b7a769e200d83535924b53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Class Action Fairness Act: More on the New FJC Data:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Conferences

ABA Section of Antitrust Law, 2009 Consumer Protection Conference
June 18-19, 2009, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC

American Bar Association 2009 Annual Meeting
July 30-August 4, 2009, Chicago, IL

Federal Trade Commission, Protecting Consumers in Debt Collection Litigation and Arbitration: A Roundtable Discussion
August 5-6, 2009, Northwestern School of Law, Chicago, IL

18th Annual Consumer Rights Litigation Conference, sponsored by the National Consumer Law Center
October 22-25, 2009, Philadelphia, PA