Other Contributors

About Us

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« Predatory Lender Gets Ten Years in the Clink | Main | Consumer Cases and the U.S. Supreme Court's Docket »

Tuesday, October 17, 2006


air max 95

Rambaud (Rudi Lamprecht) rhetoric, want to take this fight will result in Siemens brand mobile phone sales champion in China.

air max 95

In accordance with the director of the Chinese Football Association League after Ma Chengquan say, neither the company or foot Super Pipe Center, are "very focused to maintain the interests of sponsors and listen to their voices."

Vertu Ferrari

Hey this is a great post. I’m going to email this to my buddies. I stumbled on this while googling for some lyrics, I’ll be sure to come back. thanks for sharing.

Nike Air Rejuven8

Hi, where did you get this information can you please support this with some proof or you may say some good reference as I and others will really appreciate. This information is really good and I will say will always be helpful if we try it risk free. So if you can back it up. That will really help us all. And this might bring some good repute to you.

nike shox

Great article. I look forward to hearing more about this from you and the other online legal readers.

Air Max shoes

Precisely for that reason, the commitment of industry defendants and their lawyers to defending class action waivers may lead them to seek certiorari on the preemption issue, though my own view is that their chances of success are small. If that avenue proves unsuccessful, and more opinions like Kinkel follow, industry groups may put more pressure on

buy wholesale

Well good, hopefully I won't see spam in bulk in every single one of my email accounts for the rest of my life.


The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed and the new agreement had fewer anti-consumer provisions, but the court held that Cingular could not rely on an agreement that it unilaterally modified after the contractiaul relationship between the parties had already ended.


Personal Injury lawyers Chicago

Great article. I look forward to hearing more about this from you and the other online legal readers.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

December 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30