Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To subscribe by email, enter your address:

About Us

www.clpblog.org

The contributors to this blog are a diverse group of lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. Although the blog is hosted by Public Citizen's Consumer Justice Project, the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions with which they are affiliated. To view the blog's statement of policies, please click here.

Coordinators

Other Contributors

« A Haunted Case and a Comedic Court | Main | CSPI’s Litigation Project Forces Change By Two Major Food Companies »

Friday, January 12, 2007

Court Grants Federal Officer Removal Case

This afternoon, the Supreme Court announced that it has agreed--contrary the Solicitor General's recommendation--to review the Eighth Circuit's decision concluding that tobacco giant Philip Morris could remove a case to federal court on the basis of the federal officer removal statute. On Wednesday, I previewed the case (Watson v. Philip Morris) in a post you can access here, and explained why I thought the Court should take the case. Needless to say, this is one of those cases in which getting cert granted was more than half the battle. This one is exceedingly easy to predict: the Court will reverse the Eighth Circuit. Period.

Update: Ted Frank of the conservative American Enterprise Institute, who's much more sympathetic to the plight of the downtrodden tobacco companies than I am, discusses the case here and reacts to the grant here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b7a769e200d834630d7e69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Court Grants Federal Officer Removal Case:

» Supreme Court takes cert on Watson v. Philip Morris from PointOfLaw Forum
We discussed the issue January 10. Deepak Gupta predicts a reversal, and it's indeed hard to imagine circumstances where the Court would grant certiorari to affirm. It's unlikely that the Democratic Congress will step in to fix the problem that... [Read More]

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Conferences

ABA Section of Antitrust Law, 2009 Consumer Protection Conference
June 18-19, 2009, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC

American Bar Association 2009 Annual Meeting
July 30-August 4, 2009, Chicago, IL

Federal Trade Commission, Protecting Consumers in Debt Collection Litigation and Arbitration: A Roundtable Discussion
August 5-6, 2009, Northwestern School of Law, Chicago, IL

18th Annual Consumer Rights Litigation Conference, sponsored by the National Consumer Law Center
October 22-25, 2009, Philadelphia, PA