Coordinators

Other Contributors

About Us

www.clpblog.org

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« $6.9 billion is the cost of scams to UK consumers | Main | Net Neutrality News »

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Comments

Jayendra

Is there any Labelling norm established by the federal government of America for Mechandise including Health and Beauty Products.

JeffSovern

Thanks for your question. The case was actually brought by the store after it was cited by the local department of consumer affairs for violating the applicable deceptive trade practices law. If it had been brought by an injured consumer (perhaps as a class action), it probably would have made sense to add claims in implied warranty.

Dave Decot

I don't see why this suit wasn't filed on the implied warranty of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Seems to me those are more clearly applicable to this case. Perhaps the remedies are better against "deceptive" practices?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

February 2018

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28