Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To subscribe by email, enter your address:

About Us

www.clpblog.org

The contributors to this blog are a diverse group of lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. Although the blog is hosted by Public Citizen's Consumer Justice Project, the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions with which they are affiliated. To view the blog's statement of policies, please click here.

Coordinators

Other Contributors

« Kurt Eggert on Abuses by Mortgage Servicers | Main | Supercrunching and Consumers »

Friday, December 14, 2007

Another Ohio Judge Halts Foreclosures

By Alan White

A state court judge in Cincinnati has dismissed a foreclosure action because the securitization trust filing the suit was not the holder of the mortgage at the time it sued the homeowner. The judge then took the unusual step of ordering the law firm filing the foreclosure to file proof of mortgage ownership before filing any new foreclosure actions for any clients. The mortgage at issue was a teaser rate ARM, and the couple involved say they had made a payment agreement with the servicer before the foreclosure was filed.Hamilton_county_seal_color_2


The Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann has already filed motions in several Ohio counties to stop foreclosures until their legal ownership is properly established.

In many cases, the securitization trust that owns the loan will be able to obtain the necessary mortgage assignment and a properly endorsed Note, but careful compliance with court rules will put off foreclosure for 30 to 60 days. In other cases, however, especially when the original lender has gone bankrupt or otherwise imploded, it may be difficult or impossible to get the necessary signatures, and the necessary documents, to complete a legal transfer of the mortgage that was not completed before the foreclosure. There is no reliable way to estimate the percentage of cases where ownership paperwork will be unavailable, but it will be significant. Hopefully, while the servicers search frantically for the missing paperwork, they can focus more time and attention on making reasonable modifications of loan principal and interest to allow homeowners to stay in their homes, and mitigate losses to investors. The significance of these cases may also go beyond the "real party in interest" issue, as state and federal court judges may decide to flex their muscles and become less and less inclined to rubber stamp the rising flood of foreclosure filings.

A note to law professors: the Cincinnati Enquirer story cites the study of mortgage servicer errors by Katie Porter, the same study that was also cited by one of the Ohio federal court judges. Good scholarship makes a difference.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b7a769e200e54fa431f18833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Another Ohio Judge Halts Foreclosures:

» Another Ohio Judge Halts A Foreclosure from Consumerist
Another judge in Ohio has stopped a foreclosure because lawyers could not legally prove that Wells Fargo owned the mortgage. The judge said the foreclosure lawsuit was filed before Wells Fargo owned the mortgage - thus, the suit was premature.... [Read More]

Comments

Nice posting..... Thank you for sharing such a informative article.....

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Conferences

ABA Section of Antitrust Law, 2009 Consumer Protection Conference
June 18-19, 2009, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC

American Bar Association 2009 Annual Meeting
July 30-August 4, 2009, Chicago, IL

Federal Trade Commission, Protecting Consumers in Debt Collection Litigation and Arbitration: A Roundtable Discussion
August 5-6, 2009, Northwestern School of Law, Chicago, IL

18th Annual Consumer Rights Litigation Conference, sponsored by the National Consumer Law Center
October 22-25, 2009, Philadelphia, PA