Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To subscribe by email, enter your address:

About Us

www.clpblog.org

The contributors to this blog are a diverse group of lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. Although the blog is hosted by Public Citizen's Consumer Justice Project, the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions with which they are affiliated. To view the blog's statement of policies, please click here.

Coordinators

Other Contributors

« Jeffrey Stempel on Mandating Minimum Quality in Mass Arbitration | Main | Times Articles on Credit and Other Matters »

Saturday, January 03, 2009

December 2008 CPSC Product Safety Recalls

Check out the Consumer Product Safety Commission's December 2008 product safety recalls.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b7a769e2010536ae5228970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference December 2008 CPSC Product Safety Recalls:

Comments

I hope you realize you are putting many small businessed out of their jobs.

It is important to note that the problems which led to this law originated in lead charms and plastic toys made by large manufactured who import their goods from or manufacture in China. Lead in charms and phalates which result from plastic manufacturing. Since 80 of the 100 or so testing labs are in China and testing is much cheaper there, none of those toys will ever be tested IN the US. Do you trust testing from a country where melamine in pet food and baby formula originated?

Reebok and a work at home mom or your grandma are not equals.The businesses who are trying to get help are people working at home with a sewing machine crafting hand made clothes and plushies, art dolls, knitted wool hats and slippers, quilts, often made from supplies bought at Jo-ann fabric. Cotton and wool fabrics and books have not been proven to be a risk of lead.

The deadline is fast approaching and many shops and small manufacturers are unclear on how they can test affordably and whether they law applies to their product, while many more are not even aware of the law. So far the CPSC has not clarified anything for the small businesses who would genuinely like to comply. They are actually asking to be allowed to test materials rather than finished products because testing destroys one of a kind items and will cost $100,000s. No one actually wants to hurt children, they just want the CSPC to realize that the law was written with Mattel size manufacturers and their finances in mind, not a mom who sews ballet tutus at and knits baby bonnets at home.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Conferences

ABA Section of Antitrust Law, 2009 Consumer Protection Conference
June 18-19, 2009, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC

American Bar Association 2009 Annual Meeting
July 30-August 4, 2009, Chicago, IL

Federal Trade Commission, Protecting Consumers in Debt Collection Litigation and Arbitration: A Roundtable Discussion
August 5-6, 2009, Northwestern School of Law, Chicago, IL

18th Annual Consumer Rights Litigation Conference, sponsored by the National Consumer Law Center
October 22-25, 2009, Philadelphia, PA