Coordinators

Other Contributors

About Us

www.clpblog.org

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen's Consumer Justice Project, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« Joshua Fairfield: Is Do-Not-Track Enforceable In Contract? | Main | Under Supreme Court Decision, States Can Opt Out of Medicaid Expansion, But Will They? »

Monday, July 02, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b7a769e20176160c32a1970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Charles Carreon Digs Himself Even Deeper—and Register.com Betrays a Customer:

Comments

Elegy

Not that it matters, but according to his wife, he donated $1,000 and "several hundred dollars online" to the Nadar campaign. So much for Carreon being a "major" contributor, as he claimed.

Public Citizens seems to have inadvertently stepped into some previous trouble the Carreons had with Nadar's campaign staff.

http://www.naderlibrary.com/bulletin_board/viewtopic.php?t=701&start=10

YettiGetti

Sounds like a plan to me dude.

www.Planet-Privacy.tk

Kpkpkp

So his basic plan is to *carry* on as long as possible?

CRB

Isn't the threat of lawsuit to gain advantage in a civil matter against most codes of professional conduct for the majority of BARs?

Paul Levy

Response to CRB: there is nothing inherently wrong with warning a prospective defendant of an intent to sue. Sometimes people are able to work out their differences short of litigation. The problem here is that the threatened lawsuit was baseless.

In fact, in some legal regimes the parties are required to try processes short of litigation. For example, in the labor area where I used to practice actively, a union member often has to exhaust intra-union remedies before bringing a union democracy claim to court. Representing union reformers, I was often able use that process effectively to get the union's own lawyers to read their client the riot act and get them to conform to the law.

The queens English


Apparently people don't speak the Queens English anymore.

Freddy liveson

I see a little silluett-o of a man...

VegasWife'sHusband

[quote]


Not that it matters, but according to his wife, he donated $1,000 and "several hundred dollars online" to the Nadar campaign. So much for Carreon being a "major" contributor, as he claimed.

Public Citizens seems to have inadvertently stepped into some previous trouble the Carreons had with Nadar's campaign staff.

http://www.naderlibrary.com/bulletin_board/viewtopic.php?t=701&start=10
[/quote]

Wow, just wow. And not in a good way. If you click to the previous page in the above link, it gets even "wowier".

From what I've seen so far of the Carreon's, my personal guess is that they both mean well and think they are good people doing good things, but they don't seem to have a grip on reality. I'm gonna leave it at that, lest I get sued.

VegasWife'sHusband

I just noticed their "message boards" are just by them for blogging. An odd use for message boards from a woman that complains about web-censorship on other sites. The longest thread is dedicated to attack Matthew Inman. It even has vulgar comics. You might even find your own comment from a website, although they will call you a coward for posting anonymously.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

October 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31