Other Contributors

About Us

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« Times Report: Retailers Adding Financial Services | Main | Free Webinar on the CFPB's Amicus Program Next Wednesday »

Thursday, November 15, 2012



Yes definitely, security IS a strong consideration.

Certainly, it should be for credit card companies since, if they are going to be ethical, they are responsible so they should bear the financial losses that may follow. Agreed, with the profit they make, it is still a drop in the ocean, but there is additional longer term damage to some cards and I am speaking from personal experience.

After a solid reflection, I have discarded most of my credit cards save two. These are what I use and I have no need for more. There are many advantages to this decision:
First, I have studied (and tested) the quality of the customer service and of the security level of my batch of cards. From that test, I identified the best one and kept it. Interestingly, it was also the one with the highest limit, (a lucky break).
The second card is tied up to my bank and it is a safety net in case of need.
Second, I consolidated my primary card security by adding some security features of my own. This was done in collaboration with and thanks to the excellent customer service of this card and their pro-active security level.
Nothing is foolproof of course, but I feel quite safe using it at this point.
Here are some advantages of my consolidation: By using always the same card, it now has a fairly strong format of my shopping habits and comfort zone. Anything out of that framework will often generate a call to me for verification. In return, if I am going way out of normalcy with a transaction, i.e. out of country, I will notify my card. I consider that a basic courtesy.

One last but not so small detail; by condensing my expenses to one trusted card, I have simplified my accounting and increased my bonus tremendously. I can now go home to visit virtually free and business class too!
As for the other rejected cards, if my practice catches on, it may force some of them to rethink the quality of their service.
I consider that a win-win situation.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

October 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31