Other Contributors

About Us

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« Is a Resolving Door Between the SEC and Wall Street Harming Consumers? | Main | Massachusetts asks SEC to Address Investment Advisors' Use of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses »

Wednesday, February 13, 2013


Gary Petz

Good for SEnator WArren and thank Massachusetts for electing her.

David Morf

Apropos channeling Elizabeth Warren and her on-target hearing comment about "Too big to go to trial," here's a personally witnessed encounter on banks going to trial. This topic was hot when Stanley Sporkin ran the SEC Enforcement Division in the mid-1970s. Chairman Williams came to the SEC in part to derail Mr Sporkin, which Mr Williams denied the rest of his life, and Mr Sporkin denies to this day. But I sat across the conference room table on the top floor at the SEC’s 500 North Capitol Street building and witnessed a principled but fundamental private 1:1 debate whose bottom line from Chmn Williams came down to his statement that you just can't take such people to court, and to Mr Sporkin's reply that they broke the law and should stand trial. The truth is that a settlement is cash not reputation or precedent, and also that a settlement fine can be deducted from revenue as a cost of doing business. So the American people not only do not see wrongdoing expanded to include inculcating a business culture of “do it if you can get away with it,” but when you do get caught, the American people get to pay through the back door for a noticeable part of the fine or settlement. That has been the system in effect since Mr Sporkin was moved from the SEC to being the Chief Counsel of the CIA, where he could not embarrass senior business people or impact business and banking practices and interests. Even today, 2/18/2013, the NYTimes is running a story on how mortgage settlements are being gamed to benefit banks. As the old song has it, "The beat goes on..."

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

November 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30