Coordinators

Other Contributors

About Us

www.clpblog.org

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« An interview with CFPB director Richard Cordray | Main | More CFPB 5th anniversary info »

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Comments

Ted F

The real reason no one will sell them is (1) the product-liability issue and (2) the danger to self-defense. A sophisticated iPhone fingerprint reader-which would add at least $100 to the price of a gun-- takes two seconds under the best of circumstances. That's a deadly amount of time if one hopes to actually use a gun to defend oneself. And imagine the liability to the manufacturer if the reader doesn't work in that pressured situation, just as iPhone readers don't work if your hands are sweaty. So, in short, it's a feature that makes guns more expensive and less effective that consumers don't want, while increasing legal risk to the manufacture. Such a surprise that no one is making them.

Jeff Sovern

Daniel's comment assumes that guns can be personalized to only one person. I don't see why that would have to be so. Iphones can already be set up to allow more than one person access.

Daniel

I can see it now. I want to take my grandchildren to the target range, so we would need to buy all 8 of them their own gun so we could all get a chance to target shoot.

Anti-gunners (or weak Second Amendment supporting gun owners) come up with the strangest laws that will do nothing that responsible gun owners don't already do so that the gun is not readily available to children.

I got my first gun at age 7 (a .22 rifle), and at age 11 was shooting a 12 gauge shotgun that my dad bought me because I passed the written hunter-safety test with 100% while only taking the first half of the course. I had to take the second half anyway, even though my dad already taught me safety.

Otto

Useful post on a critical consumer issue.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

November 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30