Other Contributors

About Us

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« This Blog Is False and Misleading (in New York) | Main | Senate Banking Hears Testimony on Predatory Lending to Military »

Friday, September 15, 2006


buy wholesale

A short video clip dealing with overconsumption.

generic viagra

Under this private attorney general model, the individual plaintiff need not prove that she suffered injury.

Mark Schuldenfrei

Not being an attorney, I still wanted to answer your request for anecdotal information - in case it might be relevant. I've linked to a transcript of the hearing I refer to, above, and again here:

The case was:
N0. 739306 heard in Superior Court of California, Monica Cellio et al v The Society For Creative Anachronism, Inc., et al.

The SCA Inc is a silly little non-profit which was founded to support medieval and early renaissance re-enactment. I've enjoyed the hobby it supports for years. It is a 501(c)3 and a California non-profit, and has been in existence for over 35 years.

It's by-laws include a specific requirement that members (not statutory members, but donors that it calls members) may inspect the books of account.

In 1994, the SCA announced some radical changes and restructuring that were required based upon newly discovered fiscal liabilities. The quarter before that it had reported that finances were fine and normal.

A number of us objected, and tried to see the fiscal books of account. And were refused. We eventually filed for a writ of mandamus (which was granted) to see the books. Our costs and fees were awarded to us based upon the Public Attorney General statutes.

(In my opinion, I think the internal changes and refusals were because the books were an uninterpretable mess.)

The corporation instituted many fiscal changes in response to that suit, and on the whole made the organization a bit more transparent and responsive. And certainly, more responsible.

If I can answer any questions, please feel free to ask.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

December 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31