by Greg Beck
One of the many advantages of the Internet for consumers is the competition it creates. When Internet shoppers can easily compare the prices of hundreds of dealers online, it is difficult for any one dealer to get away with charging more. Thus, prices fall and consumers benefit.
Not surprisingly, however, some companies don't like their prices being undercut on the Internet and have devised a variety of strategies to squelch unwanted competition. Some companies claim using their names in an online listing infringes their trademark in the name. An even more common approach is to claim copyright infringement over unauthorized use of product images.
California resident Jamie Olson ran into this problem when she decided to make some money selling salon hair care products online. To test the waters, she bought some shampoo made by a company called Aquage and put it up on eBay. Because consumers generally like to see what they are buying, the eBay listing includes a picture of the bottle that Olson took with her own camera.
The company was not pleased. Olson soon received an email from a private investigator hired by SalonQuest, the maker of Aquage, demanding that she stop selling the products. The reason: "You are displaying copyrighted Aquage containers in your advertisements," which, according to the private investigator, is a "violation of SalonQuest's legal rights under the federal Copyright Act." Olson was given five days to "immediately remove all Aquage products from your Ebay offerings" and "confirm for us in writing your agreement to permanently discontinue all sales of Aquage products over the internet or through any other form of mail order." In other words, displaying a picture of the company's product, according to the company, infringes its copyright in the product's packaging.
Companies commonly claim that showing a picture of a product taken off a company's website for the purpose of reselling the product is an infringement of the company's copyright in the photograph. Google, for example, receives a lot of claims that pictures turned up by its Froogle shopping system infringe various copyrights, and Google adds the demand letters it receives to the database at Chilling Effects Clearinghouse. Many of these claims are not frivolous. Courts generally hold that a work need only be minimally creative to be copyrightable, and since most photographs involve at least some creative use of angles, lighting, and other compositional elements, they are generally protected. Only the most uninspired of product photographs would be too unoriginal for copyright protection.
To get around this problem, smart online sellers usually take their own pictures of the product and use those with their listings. This doesn't always work, however, because companies that think a photograph looks "too professional" will sometimes assume the picture was stolen. And other companies, like Aquage, claim to own a copyright in the underlying product, which would make any photograph of the product a copyright infringement.
Aquge's bottle appears to be a regular shampoo bottle, not particularly distinctive other than the name on the label. Utilitarian objects like a shampoo bottle generally cannot be copyrighted, nor can purely textual material on a label. Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc., 225 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2000). Even if the bottle were copyrightable, taking a picture of it for purposes of resale would likely be considered fair use under copyright law. Cf. Ty, Inc. v. Publications Int'l Ltd, 292 F.3d 512 (7th Cir. 2002).
Aquage also raises another claim commonly raised by companies trying to prevent online resale. It argues that it has contracts with its distributors limiting resale of products only to licensed vendors. Therefore, it claims that reselling its products is a breach of its contracts. But Olson never entered into a contract with Aquage. She just bought the shampoo at a store and is now trying to resell it. Aquage's contracts with its distributors doesn't give it the power to control the entire secondary market for its products.
Even if a claim like Aquage's is without legal merit, however, many small online sellers who receive a threat like this would rather cut their losses and back down than risk a lawsuit. It's usually not worth hiring a lawyer when you are only hoping to make a few bucks off the sale in the first place. With threats alone, companies are thus able to control the secondary market.
Olson, however, refused to cancel her sales in response to Aquage's threatening email. This week, she got a second email from the company's private investigator:
As you have been previously advised, this office represents SalonQuest LLC on issues relating to the distribution policies of its professional product
lines.On September 7, 2006, this office contacted you on behalf of SalonQuest concerning your unauthorized sales of Aquage products on eBay. Despite being formally notified that you are violating SalonQuest's legal rights, you have continued to list additional Aquage products on eBay. Also, you have continued to display copyrighted Aquage containers in your advertisements, yet another violation of SalonQuest's legal rights under the federal Copyright Act.
SalonQuest would prefer to resolve this issue amicably. However, unless you immediately and permanently discontinue your sales of Aquage products on eBay and through any other unauthorized channels, SalonQuest has authorized us to forward this matter and your file to its legal counsel for further action.
For now, Olson has decided to continue to ignore the company's demands. I'll post updates on this blog as the conflict develops.
Too Smart for Dad
Young man, said the angry father from the head of stairs, didn't I hear the clock strike four when you brought my daughter in?
You did, admitted the boyfriend, it was going to strike eleven, but I grabbed it and held the gong so it wouldn't disturb you.
The father muttered, Wonder why I didn't think of that one in my courting days!
Posted by: marc jacobs handbags | Wednesday, August 04, 2010 at 02:28 AM
you should post this article on basearticles.com
Posted by: Base Articles | Tuesday, July 27, 2010 at 02:38 PM
It has come to our attention that you are offering Aquage products for sale on Ebay. This activity constitutes a violation of SalonQuest’s distribution policies.
Posted by: viagra online | Tuesday, July 13, 2010 at 12:13 PM
All is but lip-wisdom that wants experience.Expericence is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards. Do you think so?
Posted by: lacoste shoes 2010 | Thursday, July 08, 2010 at 11:47 PM
Hello to all!
Exelente information, it seems to me to be very interesting and I like to receive more information of this topic
Thank you!
Good luck!
Posted by: home for sale costa rica | Monday, July 05, 2010 at 07:58 PM
I've always found acquiring trusted wholesale and dropshippers to be the biggest problem.
Posted by: Trusted Wholesale Suppliers | Thursday, June 03, 2010 at 07:22 PM
As to the case covered in the blog post, SalonQuest did not pursue the issue beyond sending threatening letters. Since then, others have complained about receiving the same or similar letters, but I have not heard of any cases where SalonQuest has taken any further action.
Posted by: louis vuitton bags | Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 05:31 AM
These comments have been invaluable to me as is this whole site. I thank you for your comment.
Posted by: buy wholesale | Monday, May 10, 2010 at 04:35 AM
It seems this whole SalonQuest / Baker Hostetler Lawfirm Letter is still going on. Is there any update on this at all?? I just got the letter from the Lawfirm after receiving the 2 emails from Patricia Urban. Has anyone been sued, or is anyone going to get sued over this ?? I've found that Baker Hostetler is famous for "Class Action" Law suites. Could they be compiling a case against EVERYONE out there for selling Aquage ?
Thanks,
Posted by: JB | Tuesday, May 04, 2010 at 05:34 PM
One of the great things about Cucumber is that it can be used to test applications in any language. I haven’t been able to track down a lot of articles of how people are using it with other languages, so please comment if you’re aware of some.
Posted by: retro shoes | Friday, April 23, 2010 at 05:08 AM
can anyone find a pair of shoes excatly (or at least fairly close) to the shoes that she is wearing with this dress??
Posted by: order viagra | Thursday, April 15, 2010 at 06:17 PM
Your article is that I wanted. I am looking for a kind of article that is similar to your. I had study Air Jordan shoes recently, you know that many people want to find a valid way to buy cheap Air Jordans shoes.
Posted by: Air Jordan sale | Sunday, February 21, 2010 at 03:12 AM
this happened to me too. I received two e-mails from Patricia Urban and then a letter from Barker Law Firm saying that I was violating the contracts they have with distributors and cosmetologist. I buy the products from different salons and then resell them. I do not see how I am breaking the law and if I am please someone tell me what law I'm breaking!!
thanks!
Posted by: Patricia Urban | Tuesday, January 26, 2010 at 04:53 PM
I just got this same letter to the T, it is amazing how this person can write such letters and threaten people. What can we do about this? I bought multiple botls and cannot use it so i plan to sell it on E-Bay and as a Seller i am doing everything including listing the right way. Is it right that this person do the wrong thing and threaten everyone? is that not grounds for Harassment?I am not going to stop selling this product until it is sold this is SECONDARY product.
Posted by: barbarasdaughter | Friday, June 05, 2009 at 03:02 PM
The only recourse Aquage has is to track the bottles being sold back to the salon they came from and then cut off the sales to the salon. They have not pursued any lawsuits against anyone on ebay....they just keep sending threatening letters to scare any small seller who might be selling their products.
Aquage, I believe does not have the ability to track the products. You can find hundreds of them on Amazon.com and the whole line is being sold on the internet every day at Sleekhair.com. If they could track the product or follow thru with any lawsuits, these products would have long ago been off the internet. They talk the talk, but they do not walk the walk.
Posted by: amanda Peco | Monday, May 04, 2009 at 04:35 PM