Watters v. Wachovia

Thanks to the Roberts Court's new and improved same-day service, here's the transcript of this morning's oral argument in the Watters v. Wachovia banking preemption case.   I haven't had time to read it yet.  If you do, and you have some thoughts about it, please let us know.

Comments

[Tariq Ahmad]

The comments suggest that the OCC does have exclusive jurisdiction

[Tariq Ahmad]

It is obvious from the questions that the state will lose

[Ted]

If the oral argument is any indication, anyone hoping for a landmark decision on the Tenth Amendment or on Chevron/Skidmore delineation is going to be disappointed.