Consumer Law & Policy Blog

Coordinators

  • Allison Zieve
    Public Citizen Litigation Group
  • Jeff Sovern
    St. John's University School of Law
  • Brian Wolfman
    Georgetown University Law Center and Harvard Law School

Other Contributors

  • Richard Alderman
    University of Houston Law Center
  • Paul Bland
    Public Justice
  • Stephen Gardner
    Consultant
  • Mike Landis
    US Public Interest Research Group
  • Paul Alan Levy
    Public Citizen Litigation Group
  • Scott Nelson
    Public Citizen Litigation Group
  • Ira Rheingold
    National Association of Consumer Advocates
  • Jon Sheldon
    National Consumer Law Center

About Us

www.clpblog.org

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

Blogs On Consumer Issues

  • Alabama Consumer Law Blog
  • Arnold & Porter Consumer Advertising Law Blog
  • CAFA Law Blog
  • Caveat Emptor
  • Citizen Vox
  • Consumer Affairs with Sheryl Harris
  • THE CONSUMERIST
  • Credit Slips
  • Home Equity Theft Reporter
  • Fair Arbitration NOW Blog
  • UCL Practitioner
  • U.S. PIRG Consumer Blog

Other Interesting Legal Blogs

  • American Constitution Society Blog
  • Balkinization
  • Concurring Opinions
  • The Conglomerate
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation DeepLinks
  • Empirical Legal Studies
  • How Appealing
  • Legal Theory Blog
  • Mass Tort Litigation Blog
  • Opinio Juris
  • PrawfsBlawg
  • Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log
  • SCOTUSblog
  • TortsProf Blog
  • Trademark Blog
  • Truth on the Market
  • The Volokh Conspiracy

Consumer Law & Policy Links

  • AAAP Foundation Litigation
  • American Collectors' Association
  • Americans for Financial Reform
  • American Tort Reform Association
  • American Association of Justice
  • Center for American Progress
  • Center for Justice and Democracy
  • Center for Responsible Lending
  • Center for Science in the Public Interest
  • Center for Study of Responsive Law
  • Consumer Action
  • Consumer Federation of America
  • Consumers Union
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation
  • Electronic Privacy Information Center
  • EU Consumer Policy Page
  • Fair Arbitration NOW
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • International Association of Consumer Law
  • National Association of Consumer Advocates
  • National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
  • National Community Reinvestment Coalition
  • National Consumer Law Center
  • Public Citizen
  • State PIRGs
  • Public Justice (formerly Trial Lawyers for Public Justice)
  • Treasury Department, Regulatory Reform Agenda
  • U.S. Chamber Legal Reform
  • U.S. Public Interest Research Group

« August 2007 | Main | October 2007 »

Sunday, September 30, 2007

President Bush Signs Landmark Student Loan Legislation

The Washington Post reports here that President Bush just signed into law major student loanImages legislation - - the College Cost Reduction and Access Act.  As indicated in our earlier post, the major focus of public attention has been Congress's efforts to slash subsidies to lenders and police improper relationships between lenders and educational institutions.  But the thrust of the legislation is the substantial reduction of interest rates for low- and moderate-income borrowers and other features that will ease student borrowing.  As the Post puts it:  The legislation "will gradually reduce interest rates on federally subsidized loans for low-income students to 3.4 percent over five years. The law will also offer loan forgiveness for those who have held public service jobs for 10 years and will cap payments on federal loans at a certain percentage of a college graduate's income."  The legislation also expands the Pell Grant program aimed at poor students.  An earlier Post story provides more detail.  The text of the legislation is available here. 

Posted by Brian Wolfman on Sunday, September 30, 2007 at 06:43 AM in Consumer Legislative Policy, Student Loans | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)

Friday, September 28, 2007

Public Citizen Report Documents Arbitration Abuses

Public Citizen's Watchdog Blog discusses a new report concluding that arbitrators rule for business between 94 and 97 percent of the time. From the blog:

Arbmba In a nutshell, [binding mandatory arbitration] is a private, corporate-dominated secret “court” that overwhelmingly rules against consumers. In this world, merely by signing your name on the dotted line, you have forfeited your right to a trial by jury. If someone steals your identity and runs out to buy a $4,000 plasma TV – and the credit card company wants YOU to pay for it – the dispute will automatically bypass the public civil justice system. Instead, it goes straight to an arbitrator who may have heard thousands of cases for that same credit card company.

View the report here.

Posted by Greg Beck on Friday, September 28, 2007 at 10:46 AM in Arbitration | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Ninth Circuit: No Cause of Action for Disparaging a Company's Trademark

by Greg Beck

In Freecycle Network v. Oey, the Ninth Circuit yesterday reversed a district court’s preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendant "from making any comments that could be construed as to disparage upon [Freecycle's] possible trademark and logo" and requiring that he "remove all postings from the [I]nternet and any other public forums that he has previously made that disparage [Freecycle's] possible trademark and logo."

Freecycle_logo Freecycle is a nonprofit corporation that hosts forums where users can give and receive free stuff online. The defendant, Tim Oey, is a former Freecycle member who had posted his opinion online that the word “freecycle” is a generic term in which the company has no trademark rights. Freecycle sued Oey, claiming that his Internet posts infringed and disparaged the company’s trademark. The district court agreed and entered the preliminary injunction. The Volokh Conspiracy has the district court's order.

On appeal, the Ninth Circuit held that Oey’s Internet posts did not infringe Freecycle’s trademark because he did not use the trademark in commerce and because his use of the trademark was not likely to confuse any consumers, two required elements of a trademark infringement claim under the Lanham Act. The court further held that there is no claim for “trademark disparagement” under the Lanham Act.

Presumably because the court held that Freecycle had no cause of action, it did not reach the question of whether the district court’s injunction violated the First Amendment. However, it’s hard to imagine how a prohibition against any speech that “could be construed as to disparage” Freecycle’s trademark could survive First Amendment scrutiny, especially where, as here, the speech is totally noncommercial. Consumers have a right to truthfully give their opinions about companies and products. Just because the opinions amount to "disparagement" doesn't give a company the right to stop it.

Nevertheless, companies unhappy about online criticism often claim that consumer disparagement of their trademarks gives rise to a cause of action under the Lanham Act. See, for example, Video Professor's case against 100 anonymous critics.

Posted by Greg Beck on Thursday, September 27, 2007 at 03:43 PM in Free Speech, Intellectual Property & Consumer Issues, Internet Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

DOT Inspector General Issues Report on On-Board Flight Delays

JetbluedelayRemember last winter when thousands of air travelers were stranded for hours and hours on runways without adequate food and water and any idea when they would be allowed off the plane? An article in today's New York Times discusses a long-awaited Department of Transportation Inspector General report on the issue.  The report itself appears to be comprehensive and detailed on the facts and the problem, but short on specific solutions.  (For instance, the report urges the agency to set a time period after which airlines must allow passengers to get off a plane, but it does not state what the limit should be.)  We blogged earlier here and here about airline passenger "bill of rights" legislation pending in Congress.

Posted by Brian Wolfman on Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 08:14 AM in Consumer Legislative Policy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Program on Advertising and Marketing in Manhattan

The Association of the Bar of the City of New York is sponsoring a program titled Hot Topics In Advertising & Marketing 2007

on Wednesday, October 24 2007 9-12:30 p.m. at 42 West 44th Street, New York City.  The program will cover recent cases and legislative developments in the areas of general advertising, advertising to children, retail practices, branded entertainment, and sweepstakes and contests, as well as an update on regulatory enforcement priorities. For more information or to register, please view the brochure, call 212-382-6663 or go to www.nycbar.org

Posted by Jeff Sovern on Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 10:34 PM in Food and Nutrition | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Monday, September 24, 2007

Sign Up for Supreme Court "Watch List"

Watchlist Right before each U.S. Supreme Court conference -- the meeting at which the Justices decide, among other things, which cases to take -- Public Citizen Litigation Group's Supreme Court Assistance Project issues an email highlighting the conference's key cases and a "Watch List" providing detail on the most important matters pending before the Court.  If you want to stay up with doings at the Court, sign up right here, and you will automatically receive the email and Watch List.  You won't be inundated: The emails come out only every week or two during the Supreme Court Term.

And there's no better time to sign up:  Today marks day one of the SupremeScotus_2 Court's "long conference" - - a meeting where the Justices will consider the pending petitions that have built up over the Court's three-month summer recess.  The Justices will issue orders this week and/or next Monday (the first day of oral argument for the new Term), granting and denying petitions for cert. and addressing various other issues in pending cases.  To see the Watch List for the "long conference," go here.  And to view the email for the long conference go here.   Finally, to view emails regarding prior Supreme Court conferences, go here.

Posted by Brian Wolfman on Monday, September 24, 2007 at 10:46 AM in U.S. Supreme Court | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Subprime Songs

Today's Times points out these YouTube videos: "Mortgage Servicing Pie," to the tune of Don McLean's "American Pie," and "Takin' Care of (Subprime) Business," to the tune of Bachman-Turner-Overdrive's "Takin' Care of Business." 

Posted by Jeff Sovern on Sunday, September 23, 2007 at 03:04 PM in Predatory Lending | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Recusals for Anti-Plaintiff Bias?

In a wrongful death action in the Texas Supreme Court, plaintiffs recently moved for recusal of four justices for anti-plaintiff bias.  Relying heavily this paper by David A. Anderson at University of Texas (Austin), the plaintiffs argue that bias is evident from a couple of factors:  First, defendants won 87% of tort cases in the Texas Supreme Court in 2004 and 2005, a fact that Anderson argues cannot be explained by (1) the court's having left plaintiff victories in the courts of appeals undisturbed; (2) the correction of rogue courts of appeals; or (3) the implementation of tort reform legislation.  Second, defendants prevailed on 18 of 22 petitions alleging that there was "no evidence" to support a jury verdict, notwithstanding that in 17 of those cases the jury, the trial judge, and the court of appeals all found evidence supporting liability.

These are cogent arguments that tort plaintiffs don't get a fair shake in the Texas Supreme Court.  But assuming this motion will not secure the recusal of any justice, what might it accomplish?

Posted by David Arkush on Sunday, September 23, 2007 at 01:02 PM in Consumer Litigation | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Video on Predatory Credit Card Lending to College Students - Take Two

Yesterday, I blogged about a video produced by Americans for Fairness in Lending concerning predatory credit card lending to college students, with the video imbedded.  I just learned that daily email subscribers from this blog were not able to see the imbedded video.  So, for those folks, here's the video.  Enjoy.

Posted by Brian Wolfman on Saturday, September 22, 2007 at 08:38 AM in Predatory Lending | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)

Friday, September 21, 2007

Americans for Fairness in Lending Releases Cartoon Video on Predatory Lending

Check out this video by Americans for Fairness in Lending on credit card company tactics.

The video focuses on efforts to drive college students into debt.  In that regard, you might want to look at this law review article: Maxed Out College Students: A Call to Limit Credit Card Solicitations on College Campuses, by Creola Johnson, a Professor at Ohio State law school.

Posted by Brian Wolfman on Friday, September 21, 2007 at 04:45 PM in Predatory Lending | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Older »

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

  • My latest paper: Not-So-Smartphone Disclosures
  • Maryland seeking applications for consumer law endowed faculty position
  • FTC issues ANPR on consumer privacy and data security
  • Today at the CFPB
  • Cal Chief Judge calls for stronger oversight of "private judging," after scandal involving JAMS
  • Maybe it's the Chamber that needs to be held accountable: comments on their ad attacking the CFPB
  • Bruckner & Ryan paper compares complaints about fintech and traditional student loan lenders & servicers
  • GOP legislators accuse CFPB of colluding with states, as Kraninger did
  • WSJ: Equifax Sent Lenders Inaccurate Credit Scores on Millions of Consumers
  • Unfairness and Disparate Effects
  • CFPB analysis of potential impacts of medical debt credit reporting changes
  • OCC CFP: THE IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY FOR BANKING
  • Dan Solove gives the pending privacy bill a B+ but pans preemption
  • Paper responds to Wilf-Townsend's Assembly-Line Plaintiffs
  • CFP: Berkeley Consumer Law Conference
  • The National Consumer Law Center is hiring a LITIGATION DIRECTOR
  • WSJ: CFPB working on guidance to force banks to cover more scams on Zelle and similar apps
  • Consumer law and the "major questions" doctrine
  • Will Congress pass an online privacy bill?
  • Distracted driving kills thousands of people every year
  • Chao paper suggests unjust enrichment claims confer standing, even after TransUnion
  • CFPB issues advisory to protect privacy when companies compile personal data
  • Regulators fine BofA $225 million over botched disbursement of unemployment benefits
  • Consumer protection and the Supreme Court's new "major questions doctrine"
  • CFPB moves to reduce fees charged by debt collectors
  • Vijay Raghavan Essay: Shifting Burdens at the Fringe
  • FTC sues Walmart for facilitating money transfer fraud
  • CFPB affirms states' ability to police credit reporting markets
  • Can you solve the mystery of why the Credit CARD Act treats penalty fees differently from penalty interest rates and other fees?
  • CFPB Spring Regulatory Agenda is up and arbitration isn't on it
  • CFP: CFPB consumer finance research conference
  • My Daughter’s @Delta Disaster Story: The Last Chapter (I hope)

Categories

  • Advertising
  • Arbitration
  • Auto Issues
  • Book & Movie Reviews
  • Books
  • CL&P Blog
  • CL&P Roundups
  • Class Actions
  • Conferences
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
  • Consumer History
  • Consumer Law Scholarship
  • Consumer Legislative Policy
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Consumer Product Safety
  • Credit Cards
  • Credit Reporting & Discrimination
  • Debt Collection
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Food and Nutrition
  • Foreclosure Crisis
  • Free Speech, Intellectual Property & Consumer Issues
  • Global Consumer Protection
  • Identity Theft
  • Internet Issues
  • Law & Economics
  • Other Debt and Credit Issues
  • Predatory Lending
  • Preemption
  • Privacy
  • Student Loans
  • Teaching Consumer Law
  • Television
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Unfair & Deceptive Acts & Practices (UDAP)
  • Web/Tech
  • Weblogs

Archives

  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

August 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31