Other Contributors

About Us

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« New Times Reports on Conning the Elderly, FDA Inspections, and Lead in Toys | Main | Lexis Willing to Abandon Unfair Arbitration Clause »

Thursday, January 31, 2008



Mandatory binding arbitration is very realyable and useful.


That's seems both procedurally and substantively unconscionable. It is procedurally unconscionable because there is no explanation to the customer or certainty on any part that the customer understands and agrees to the provision - this will clearly have the effect of surprising the customer. It is substantively unconscionable at the very least because of the onesidedness of the provision. Under Armendariz, arbitration agreements require at least a modicum of bilaterality.


Whataburger is awesome. I think I'll eat there tonight.

little ole me

So, can I just print that on a t-shirt?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

October 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30