Physical products, from toasters and lawnmowers to infant car seats and toys to meat and drugs, are routinely inspected and regulated for safety. Credit products, like mortgage loans and credit cards, on the other hand, are left largely unregulated, even though they can also be unsafe. Because financial products are analyzed through a contract paradigm rather than a products paradigm, consumers have been left with unsafe credit products. These dangerous products can lead to financial distress, bankruptcy and foreclosure, and, as evidenced by the recent subprime crisis, they can have devastating effects on communities and on the economy. In this Article, we use the physical products analogy to build a case, supported by both theory and data, for comprehensive safety regulation of consumer credit. We then examine the current state of consumer credit regulation, explaining why the current regulatory regime has systematically failed to provide meaningful safety regulations. We propose a fundamental restructuring of this regime, urging the creation of a new federal regulator that will have both the authority and the incentives to police the safety of consumer credit products.
If you do not want to receive this kind of messages: Just disable anonymous comments!
Posted by: AIR JORDAN | Friday, July 30, 2010 at 06:35 AM
As anybody understands respect is one of the most imperative amongst people's existence. Only respect one another to obtain along properly and I feel that leaving one's opinion is often a behavior of respect. Do you feel so?
Posted by: Air Jordan shoes | Saturday, July 03, 2010 at 03:32 AM
Elizabeth Warren knows her stuff. She has always been a representative of working-class America, as illustrated in her book, All Your Worth. I was most struck by how she explains that the rules of personal finance have changed; click on my name for more info.
Posted by: Damien (the bite size idea guy) | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 06:49 PM