by Greg Beck
The Second Circuit today affirmed a district court decision holding many of New York's 2007 lawyer advertising amendments unconstitutional under the First Amendment. Public Citizen challenged the rules on the ground that they served no legitimate consumer-protection function and instead served to protect established lawyers from competition and corporations from unwanted lawsuits. As the FTC has argued, such anticompetitive lawyer advertising rules ultimately harm consumers by leading to higher prices and lower quality legal services.
completely agree with this decision
Posted by: kids spelling games | Thursday, July 29, 2010 at 03:01 AM
I don't agree with this article... not at all....
Posted by: Personal Injury Lawyers Houston | Wednesday, July 21, 2010 at 06:37 PM
Aditya Monday morning friend? You are right, I come here every Monday, it becomes my hobby now. Cheers!
Thanks Ryan!
Posted by: ed hardy swimwear | Tuesday, July 20, 2010 at 03:40 AM
Thanks for keeping this important issue in the limelight, where it should be.
Posted by: jordan shoes | Thursday, July 08, 2010 at 03:42 AM
Overall, this was probably a good decision. Of course, we now have a lifetime of tacky "Have you been injured?"-type ads to look forward to.
Posted by: louis vuitton bags | Tuesday, May 25, 2010 at 09:13 PM
Great, more "Have you been injured?" ads.
Posted by: Free Articles Directory Submission | Saturday, May 22, 2010 at 05:12 PM
Thanks for keeping this important issue in the limelight, where it should be.
Dave Oedel
Posted by: buy wholesale | Monday, May 10, 2010 at 03:22 AM
Overall, this was probably a good decision. Of course, we now have a lifetime of tacky "Have you been injured?"-type ads to look forward to.
Posted by: RustyShackleford | Monday, March 22, 2010 at 05:59 PM