Georgetown law professor David Cole maintains in this N.Y. Review of Books piece that when the Supreme Court engages in "strict scrutiny" of legislative regulation of corporate speech (as in the Citizens United case), the Court is really strict, but when national security is the governmental interest, "strict scrutiny" is something altogether different.


Citizens United case), the Court is really strict, but when national security is the governmental interest, "strict scrutiny" is something altogether different.
Posted by: michael jordan shoes | Thursday, July 08, 2010 at 03:39 AM