Consumer Law & Policy Blog

« June 2010 | Main | August 2010 »

Friday, July 02, 2010

Should Parents Be Punished For Smoking While Their Kids Are In The Car?

The New York Times reports today that

Under a City Council proposal, New York City would prohibit smoking in cars where children are riding, joining the ranks of Arkansas, Louisiana, Puerto Rico, Bangor, Me., and Rockland County, N.Y., where similar legislation has been passed. The proposal, which Councilman James F. Gennaro, a Queens Democrat, plans to formally announce on Thursday, would prohibit smoking in cars where a child under 18 is present. Fines would range from $200 to $2,000, depending on the number of violations. Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, who pushed through a ban on indoor smoking in 2003, and his administration have not said whether they will support the proposal.

And the Consumerist notes that the New York legislature will be considering similar legislation:

I've never smoked a cigarette in my life, but I sure inhaled my fair share of my mom's, dad's and stepfather's tobacco when I was a child. Surely one of my earliest developed motor skills was learning how to roll down the window in our Chevy Nova. Now a bill under consideration by the New York State Assembly seeks to put an end to such behavior by fining adults who light up with a child in the vehicle.

Posted by Brian Wolfman on Friday, July 02, 2010 at 11:34 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

CPSC Recalls for June 2010

Just to add to your product recall fatigue, here are the Consumer Product Safety Commission recalls for June 2010.

Posted by Brian Wolfman on Friday, July 02, 2010 at 10:08 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Product Recall Fatigue

Today's Washington Post has this front page article on so-called product recall fatigue. The concern is that there are so many product recalls -- some of course more critical than others -- that consumers get lost and won't respond in large enough numbers to any of them. Below are a couple excerpts that describe the problem and some things the government is doing to deal with it. It's worth reading in full.

McDonald's asked customers to return 12 million glasses emblazoned with the character Shrek. Kellogg's warned consumers to stop eating 28 million boxes of Froot Loops and other cereals. Campbell Soup asked the public to return 15 million pounds of SpaghettiOs, and seven companies recalled 2 million cribs. And that was just a fraction of the products recalled in the United States last month alone. Government regulators, retailers, manufacturers and consumer experts are concerned that recall notices have become so frequent across a range of goods -- foods, consumer products, cars -- that the public is suffering from "recall fatigue."

* * *

"The national recall system that's in place now just doesn't work," said Craig Wilson, assistant vice president for quality assurance and food safety at Costco. "We call it the Chicken Little syndrome. If you keep shouting at the wind -- 'The sky is falling! The sky is falling!' -- people literally become immune to the message." 

* * *

"There is so much information out there, if you paid attention to every recall notice that came out every day, you'd go nuts," said [William K.] Hallman, [a Rutgers professor] who has studied consumer attitudes toward food recalls with a grant partially funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. He conducted a national survey last year in which 12 percent of respondents said they knowingly had eaten a recalled food. 

* * *

The government maintains a Web site, http://www.recalls.gov, offering information about all kinds of recalls, and consumers can subscribe for e-mail alerts about specific products. On Friday, federal officials plan to roll out a smartphone application so consumers can check recalls as they shop.

Posted by Brian Wolfman on Friday, July 02, 2010 at 07:40 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

Thursday, July 01, 2010

More on Financial Reform Legislation

We posted last night on the House's passage of the financial reform legislation. Although President Obama wanted to sign the legislation before July 4th, that won't happen because of concerns about getting 60 votes in the Senate. Today's Washington Post explains the wrangling to get the 4 or 5 Senators whose votes are not yet assured. [It's hard to believe, though, that the Senate won't get to 60.]

On a related note, Fortune magazine's senior editor at large Allen Sloane tells us why, in his view, "with a rare exception or two, th[e] 2,000-page [financial reform] bill nibbles at the toes of the problems that brought us the worldwide financial meltdown. It doesn't go for the throat -- its sponsors just pretend that it does." 


Posted by Brian Wolfman on Thursday, July 01, 2010 at 09:08 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

The Future of Financial Reform: Looking Ahead

A few days ago, the indefatigable consumer advocate Ed Mierzwinski of U.S. PIRG had these forward-looking thoughts about financial reform at his Consumer Blog.  "It will be critical," Ed observes, "for public interest groups and the media to do three things over the next few years:"

Crystal-ball 

-- First, we need to participate in the implementation of the law to make sure that industry lobbyists, well-versed in the ways of regulatory bureaucracy, don't use the regulatory and transition process to delay or weaken the act's provisions. 

-- Second, we need to watchdog the Congress and make sure it fulfills the oversight and accountability role it largely dropped for over ten years. The proposed act did not take the approach of breaking up the big banks or banning most risky practices. Instead it provides a very good set of tools for regulators to ensure that the banks don't take imprudent risks or do anything stupid. For this to happen, Congress needs to make sure that the administration appoints good regulators and Congress needs to do its job by making sure that those regulators do their jobs. Congress needs also to act swiftly on presidential appointments to the financial system, such as on the President's current nominees for Federal Reserve governor, including Maryland Banking Commissioner Sarah Bloom Raskin. In early August, the president will have another critical appointment available, as the term of John Dugan, head of the obscure but powerful Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), expires. Dugan has long been a steadfast opponent of states and their attorneys general taking action to protect the public against predatory or risky bank practices at the same time as his own federal agency failed to enact or enforce strong rules. Lately, he has spent most of his time blaming other than his national banks for the crisis. Most people know better. The OCC needs better leadership as its powers as prudential bank regulator are expanded under the bill and the soon-to-be-defunct Office of Thrift Supervision is rolled into it. No one will miss the OTS, which missed the warning signs of numerous bank failures and covered up others. 

-- Third, we need to plan for the future by making sure Congress finishes its unfinished business that wasn't done in the mammoth act. High on that list will be solving the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac conundrum as the firms are still bleeding billions of dollars. [And] although Congress enacted the landmark Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, it failed to modernize the Federal Trade Commission.

(As a litigator, I'd add that we need to be ready to bring and defend the inevitable litigation, including regulatory challenges, that will arise out of the new legislation and its implementing regs).

Henry Sommer, a distinguished consumer advocate and bankruptcy expert, is also thinking about the past and future of consumer rights, but in much broader terms. He's guest-blogging at Credit Slips and you can read the first in a series of his reflections here, suggesting we may be experiencing a return toward consumer protection after a thirty-year hiatus.

Posted by Public Citizen Litigation Group on Thursday, July 01, 2010 at 08:00 AM in Consumer Legislative Policy | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

« More Recent