Other Contributors

About Us

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« What Wall Street Reform Means for You | Main | Amy Schmitz Article on Arbitration Clause Regulation »

Thursday, July 22, 2010


Michael Lemov

It is better than surrendering legal rights in advance of a dispute. And there are some pro bono state bar programs that could bring civil caaes for breach of contract or fraud on behalf of a consumer.

Peter Hebert

Title IV is mislabeled and misleading. For example, barring arbitration agreements as a condition of a loan application is good. But, where is the criminal component for breach of contract? Most borrowers are broke, which is why they need to take on more debt. They cannot handle the legal expenses associated with litigation in a civil dispute. The point is, while this is a step in the right direction, it is not a true step forward.

Peter Hebert
Author of MORTGAGED AND ARMED (Freedom House Press, July 4, 2010)

Rerto Jordans

I like seeing movie rather than shopping. And you?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

September 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30