Coordinators

Other Contributors

About Us

www.clpblog.org

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« Federal Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Against Rule Limiting Credit Card Fees | Main | Senate Banking Committee Expected to Vote on Cordray Nomination Next Thursday »

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Comments

computer schools in Chicago

I am really not surprised at all that the banks are about to charge fees directly to consumers in order to reimburse the loss they will have further to the new Federal rule. Isn't that the way things are always going ?

Brian

To R.Quinn: I'm not blaming the banks in this instance. If anything, I'm blaming the Fed. Or maybe I'm blaming no one. I was just noting that when you put an economic squeeze on in one place (in this case, when the Fed limited what the banks could charge retailers), it's hardly a surprise that the squeezed actor will try, if possible, to make up the difference elsewhere (in this case, reflected by the banks charging consumers for using debit cards). I wondering whether the Fed thought through the consequences of its regulatory action.

R Quinn

Why not look at the root cause, it's not the banks who are passing on costs but the retailers who backed this change and are getting a windfall. Do you want to cut profits of the institutions we are keeping afloat in a financial crisis?

Http://quinnscommentary.com

John P.

As you note, this is hardly surprising, which makes me wonder why something can't be done about companies that continually shift costs like these to the consumer. Would it have been even theoretically possible for the Fed to have prohibited the companies from passing along the cost of their reduced profits to the consumer?

I often wonder the same thing in the context of litigation that results in large punitive damage awards, and whether the companies simply increase their prices after such award, effectively causing all of us to pay the cost of their malfeasance.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

August 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31