We posted on Monday about whether a recent case out of the Montana Supreme Court would be a vehicle for the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit its controversial 5-to-4 Citizens United ruling, or whether the Montana ruling upholding a state ban on direct corporate campaign spending might just be summarily reversed in light of Citizens United. I thought readers might be interested in perusing all the briefs filed in the Montana case, which SCOTUSblog has conveniently posted here.
« Is Unfair Exploitation of a Legal Loophole Blocking Access to Generic Drugs? | Main | FTC wins false advertising case against POM Wonderful »
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Gracias. A smile and thanks. A kiss. A hug.
Posted by: Adult High School Diploma | Thursday, May 24, 2012 at 03:19 AM