As explained here in today's Washington Post, the nation's largest health insurer, United Healthcare, says that it will retain some of the Affordable Care Act's important benefits even if the Supreme Court holds that the Act is unconstitutional.
Here's an excerpt from the Post article:
The nation’s largest health insurer will keep in place several key consumer provisions mandated by the 201 health-care law regardless of whether the statute survives Supreme Court review. Officials at UnitedHealthcare will announce Monday that whatever the outcome of the court decision — expected this month — the company will continue to provide customers preventive health-care services without co-payments or other out-of-pocket charges, allow parents to keep adult children up to age 26 on their plans, and maintain the more streamlined appeals process required by the law. UnitedHealthcare would also continue to observe the law’s prohibitions on putting lifetime limits on insurance payouts and rescinding coverage after a member becomes ill, except in cases where a member intentionally lied on an insurance application.
Could it be that the ACA has nudged United Health to change its policies (at least for the time being)? Is it just good business for United Healthcare to maintain provisions already in effect that are popular with its insureds? United Healthcare's announcement makes me think that, despite the ACA's supposed lack of popularity, many parts of the law that are in effect are in fact quite popular. (We know that the provision mandating that children under age 26 must be offered insurance on their parents' plans has proved very popular. (Go here as well.)) Presumably, United Health is not interested in foisting on its insureds benefits that they dislike.
Now let's see whether some of United Healthcare's competitors follow suit.
Insurance companies are becoming more responsible to the people in terms of safeguarding the health of every individual. Healthcare should be considered as the first priority as it enables us to contribute more good deeds in the society. It would be very helpful for a company that gives insurance if in case the person's health is in danger, and beneficial to that person because he can now withdraw an ample amount of cash from the insurance company for hospitalization expenses.
Posted by: Steeve Rochet | Friday, August 17, 2012 at 10:00 PM
In my opinion court is right. Its not only beneficial for the insurance company but also for the people.
I think its a good news for the people.
Regards, best cosmetic surgery hospital india
Posted by: Account Deleted | Tuesday, June 12, 2012 at 08:11 AM