Other Contributors

About Us

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« More on a Constitutional Amendment to Overrule Citizens United | Main | Ninth Circuit Revises Opinion Rejecting Cereal Settlement »

Wednesday, September 05, 2012


settlement quotes

Many homeowners, particularly in states like Florida, Arizona, Nevada and California, have
negative equity in their homes and have no realistic ability of refinancing or selling their homes

Baarr Suvo

there is a experience of fraud calls and I check out this website, which is help me a lot..

You know about fraud-checking calls, of course. Whenever one does something unusual with your cash, like try and close using a house purchase, transfer funds to a close relative who's lost everything although abroad, or buy a major gift for a very wedding day, the transaction is often then a call from the bank, demanding that you verify your identity to them, handing over all varieties of personal information to an overall stranger who's rung you up seemingly unprovoked. Then they tell people that they've noticed a thing amiss, and is your card in your possession, and did you actually just try and transfer one thousand pounds to Lagos?

The particular banks, bless them, are merely trying to prevent sham, but this is a fairly silly way of going about it. For starters, there's the business involving calling up people and asking them to offer you all the information necessary to prove they are indeed a bank customer – all the info that a fraudster must impersonate that person with the bank, in other words. The banks have put in decades systematically conditioning us to offer our personal information to be able to fraudsters, which is a strange solution to prevent fraud.

But a minimum of this silliness had one saving grace: a fraudster can only make numerous calls per day, and so the scope of losses from this type of programme of bad security education is limited by the human frailties involving con-artists.

Enter the robo-caller. The banks are now outsourcing their fraud prevention to computers that could make dozens of calls in a short time, around the clock, fishing (or phishing) intended for someone who just happened to get made an unusual purchase and is thus willing to spill all his details down the phone to get it accepted. Note that most on the categories of purchase that trigger false positives from fraud detection systems can also be the sort of matter that customers are anxious to view go off without any hitch. The unusual along with the urgent often travel together.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

November 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30