Here.
« April 2014 | Main | June 2014 »
Here.
Posted by Brian Wolfman on Monday, May 05, 2014 at 09:47 AM | Permalink
With four judges dissenting from en banc rehearing and the three original panel members explaining why they think they were right the first time around. Read today's opinions here. The dissenters, in an opinion written by Judge Thomas Ambro, say that the federal rules committee should take up the issues raised by the panel's decision.
For our previous discussions of Carrera, go here, here, here, and here.
Posted by Brian Wolfman on Friday, May 02, 2014 at 04:06 PM | Permalink
Apple, Google, Microsoft and Facebook are going to start telling us when the government wants our online data. The government, predictably, isn't happy. The Washington Post has the story.
Posted by Scott Michelman on Friday, May 02, 2014 at 12:01 PM | Permalink
Many people's eyes probably start to glaze over at the mention of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. But a recent action by the federal Advisory Committee on Civil Rules bears mentioning, and not just for civil procedure nerds.
Posted by Scott Michelman on Thursday, May 01, 2014 at 04:38 PM | Permalink
That's the title of this article by Katelyn Polantz. The survey says that big private law firms have the greatest disparities, and with smaller private firms have smaller disparities, with men making more than women in both settings. But there's this:
Public interest law and solo practices were the only job settings where the median income for women, at $90,000 in public interest and $65,000 in solo, outpaced men, at $70,000 and $60,000, respectively.
So, it's not just that public-interest lawyers have way more fun.
Posted by Brian Wolfman on Thursday, May 01, 2014 at 04:21 PM | Permalink