Other Contributors

About Us

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« Illinois Supreme Court Orders Identification of Anonymous Critic | Main | Taha Paper on Advertising Atypical Results »

Saturday, June 20, 2015



The gag order was surely necessary to prevent, as long as possible, a variety of recalcitrant Internet users from unleashing a campaign of criticism and satire directed against American legal authorities. As Paul admits, it is "hard to fault" the prosecutors for taking the comments "seriously." Indeed, contrary to what certain individuals have been suggesting, these menacing statements posted on Reason were not mere "hyperbole," any more than the criminally deceitful emails sent by a "satirist" in New York were mere poor efforts at parody or blustery expressions of anger. See the documentation of America's leading criminal satire case at:

And, lest the point of my remark be misunderstood, I believe it is worth reminding certain "freedom of speech" defenders that when we don't stand up for everyone's rights, we should not be surprised when our own rights end up getting trampled on with big black boots. The so-called First Amendment bloggers have done well to ignore the dissenting opinion of a single liberal judge (oddly, the chief judge of the New York Court of Appeals) in the case I have linked, which foolishly speaks of an "atavism at odds with the First Amendment and the free and uninhibited exchange of ideas it is meant to foster." Let us all agree that certain forms of speech are so inappropriate that they need to be suppressed at all costs, and save the hypocritical expressions of concern for Reason (no doubt a venue where many of us might like to be published) for more useful occasions.


Why not name the "overbearing" AUSA?

Joe Zillo

Ok I use to work with Paul more years ago than I care to admit so full disclosure here. That said Paul is one of the original defenders f free speech in print and now more than ever in these days is social media and the Internet

I urge others to heed the call from Paul and his colleagues at Public Citizen whenever they raise their voices and the legal tools available to protect the "small guy" in the name of free speech

Another great reminder to all of us who take for granted this for granted.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

September 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30