Other Contributors

About Us

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« CFPB finds consumers complain of needless hurdles in applying for lower student loan payments | Main | Video on CFPB Debt Collection Rule Proposals »

Tuesday, August 23, 2016


Matthew Chan

Hello James L. Smith,

In response to your comment, I agree with you there is probably some criminal element at play here and there probably needs to be an investigation by someone in law enforcement to uncover the truth.

Matthew Chan

Matthew Chan

Hello David Schwartz,

In response to your post, if you read Mr. Levy's accounting of events, it APPEARS to me that Stuart Oberman, Patel's lawyer, was brought in with little notice and/or preparation. He probably only had Patel's word to go on initially. Mr. Oberman stated in his letter that he will be conducting an investigation and I am inclined to believe him. But I am disappointed that he would not reveal the identity of the SEO/reputation management firm to Mr. Levy. Perhaps he will change his mind later on.

We can only hope Mr. Oberman will report back to Mr. Levy his findings so the true perpetrator can be determined and found. If Patel was not the perpetrator of the court filing, I can accept that. However, I am not prepared to accept that Patel had ZERO role in all this.

I think it is safe to say MANY PEOPLE simply want the truth of the matter and get to the bottom of this scheme that has been uncovered.

To quote Mr. Levy, "Stay tuned".

Matthew Chan

James L. Smith

My money says Dr. Mitul Patel's DNA and fingerprints are all over that fraudulent Baltimore lawsuit. Distancing himself from the fraud reminds me of check forgers who induce someone else to forge the check, and then utter it, hoping to escape criminal liability.

I got a feeling there's a criminal conspiracy in which the parties were Patel and some sleazy characters operating a clean-up-your-bad-internet-reputation scam.

If this is indeed what happened, the FBI needs to act, and act fast. A cancer like this will spread like wildfire.

David Schwartz

Is it typical for a letter demanding action on the basis of extraordinary claims to provide no evidence whatsoever for them? There isn't even a signed statement from Dr. Patel. If I honestly expected someone to act on this letter I would have included an affidavit from Dr. Patel and a copy of the notice I sent to the Court alerting them to the fraud.


If he gave the SEO scum access to his email account, he could have no knowledge of the email, yet his account would not be spoofed.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

September 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30