Other Contributors

About Us

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

« Bipartisan bill would ban high-cost loans | Main | How Much Should Mathew Higbee’s Targets Pay to Get Him Off Their Backs? »

Tuesday, November 12, 2019


Gregory Gauthier

Apparently, JAMS was so fed up with logistical issues arising from inmate arbitrations with JPay that they told JPay to remove them from their arbitration clauses. This is according to a letter filed in Kensu v. JPay, Inc. (E.D. Mich), ECF 29-1, after JAMS declined to hear Kensu's arbitration. According to JPay, they have now switched to AAA, (ECF 29 at 5) although their clause doesn't appear in the AAA's Consumer Clause Registry.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

July 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31