Consumer Law & Policy Blog

Coordinators

  • Allison Zieve
    Public Citizen Litigation Group
  • Jeff Sovern
    St. John's University School of Law
  • Brian Wolfman
    Georgetown University Law Center and Harvard Law School

Other Contributors

  • Richard Alderman
    University of Houston Law Center
  • Paul Bland
    Public Justice
  • Stephen Gardner
    Consultant
  • Mike Landis
    US Public Interest Research Group
  • Paul Alan Levy
    Public Citizen Litigation Group
  • Scott Nelson
    Public Citizen Litigation Group
  • Ira Rheingold
    National Association of Consumer Advocates
  • Jon Sheldon
    National Consumer Law Center

About Us

www.clpblog.org

The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.

Blogs On Consumer Issues

  • Alabama Consumer Law Blog
  • Arnold & Porter Consumer Advertising Law Blog
  • CAFA Law Blog
  • Caveat Emptor
  • Citizen Vox
  • Consumer Affairs with Sheryl Harris
  • THE CONSUMERIST
  • Credit Slips
  • Home Equity Theft Reporter
  • Fair Arbitration NOW Blog
  • UCL Practitioner
  • U.S. PIRG Consumer Blog

Other Interesting Legal Blogs

  • American Constitution Society Blog
  • Balkinization
  • Concurring Opinions
  • The Conglomerate
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation DeepLinks
  • Empirical Legal Studies
  • How Appealing
  • Legal Theory Blog
  • Mass Tort Litigation Blog
  • Opinio Juris
  • PrawfsBlawg
  • Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log
  • SCOTUSblog
  • TortsProf Blog
  • Trademark Blog
  • Truth on the Market
  • The Volokh Conspiracy

Consumer Law & Policy Links

  • AAAP Foundation Litigation
  • American Collectors' Association
  • Americans for Financial Reform
  • American Tort Reform Association
  • American Association of Justice
  • Center for American Progress
  • Center for Justice and Democracy
  • Center for Responsible Lending
  • Center for Science in the Public Interest
  • Center for Study of Responsive Law
  • Consumer Action
  • Consumer Federation of America
  • Consumers Union
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation
  • Electronic Privacy Information Center
  • EU Consumer Policy Page
  • Fair Arbitration NOW
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • International Association of Consumer Law
  • National Association of Consumer Advocates
  • National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
  • National Community Reinvestment Coalition
  • National Consumer Law Center
  • Public Citizen
  • State PIRGs
  • Public Justice (formerly Trial Lawyers for Public Justice)
  • Treasury Department, Regulatory Reform Agenda
  • U.S. Chamber Legal Reform
  • U.S. Public Interest Research Group

« February 2020 | Main | April 2020 »

Monday, March 30, 2020

Coronavirus puts credit ratings at risk

U.S. Public Interest Research Group's Ed Mierzwinski  and Sabrina Clevenger write that the effects of coronavirus "will send credit reports in a downward spiral" and explain how Congress can help. Their op-ed in USA Today is here.

Posted by Allison Zieve on Monday, March 30, 2020 at 01:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Massachusetts regulation prohibits creditors from debt collection that requires people to leave their homes

Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey on Friday announced that her office has filed an emergency regulation that prohibits creditors from engaging in methods of debt collection that can require people to leave their homes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Healey said the regulation, 940 CMR 35.00, is designed to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive debt collection practices during the outbreak of COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus. It is effective immediately and will remain in effect for 90 days or until the state of emergency declared by the governor is over.

In addition to prohibiting the filing new lawsuits against Massachusetts consumers, visiting their homes or places of work, or repossessing their cars, the regulation prohibits debt collection agencies and debt buyers from making unsolicited debt collection telephone calls to consumers.

Posted by Allison Zieve on Monday, March 30, 2020 at 01:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Friday, March 27, 2020

Conservative/industry CFPB Taskforce on consumer laws issues request for information

by Jeff Sovern

Earlier this year, the CFPB created a Taskforce to make "recommendations for ways to improve and strengthen consumer financial laws and regulations." The Taskforce is chaired  by George Mason professor Todd Zwyicki and its other members are J. Howard Beales III, Thomas A. Durkin, William C. MacLeod, and Jean Noonan.  As far as I can tell, all the Taskforce members are white Washington, D.C. area folks. They have tended in the past to take conservative positions on consumer law, or represented the industry, or both. I certainly do not mean to suggest that the members of the Taskforce are not qualified to serve on it, nor am I suggesting that any member of the Taskforce will not act in good faith. But a Taskforce that included consumer advocates and more diversity would be more likely to offer a balanced approach to consumer protection and elicit support for its proposals from both sides of the aisle. [Disclosure: I applied to serve on the Taskforce but my application was denied.] 

Another point about the Taskforce: it is to give its final report no later than January of 2021. In other words, if a Democrat wins the presidency this fall, is inaugurated January 20, 2021, immediately fires Director Kraninger (a power the president might or might not have after  SCOTUS decides Seila Law), and names an acting director, the likelihood is that the Taskforce's report would already have been submitted.  

The CFPB's website explains that "The taskforce is in part inspired by an earlier commission established by the Consumer Credit Protection Act (Act) in 1968." But that commission seems very different from the Taskforce in several respects. For one thing, the Commission did not issue its final report until 1972, three years after it was fully constituted. For another, its membership included notable consumer advocates, such as Senator William Proxmire and Representative Leonor K. Sullivan, though it also included industry representatives, such as Ira Millstein and conservatives like Senator John Tower. In other words, the Commission included more ideological diversity and took more time to consider its report. In addition, the Commission was created by an act of Congress, rather than an agency director who has frequently declined to comment on statutes during her testimony before Congress, stating instead that her job is to implement them.

In any event, the Taskforce has now issued a request for information, and you can read it here. It will be interesting to see both what responses it elicits and how the Taskforce treats them.

Posted by Jeff Sovern on Friday, March 27, 2020 at 04:25 PM in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Consumer History, Consumer Legislative Policy | Permalink | Comments (1)

Consumer protections announced in response to COVID-19

The National Consumer Law Center has posted a compilation of "major consumer protections announced in response to COVID-19," including suspensions on foreclosures, evictions, terminations on telecommunications and utility service, elimination of interest, and forbearance on student loan payments. The webpage is here.

Posted by Allison Zieve on Friday, March 27, 2020 at 03:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Thursday, March 26, 2020

States urge online retailers to crack down on coronavirus price gouging

A bipartisan group of state attorneys general on Wednesday sent letters to major online retailers urging them crack down on price gouging on their online platforms amid the spread of coronavirus. The 34 attorneys general asked Amazon, Craigslist, eBay, Facebook and Walmart build tools to detect price spikes and create landing pages for people to report cases of price gouging. The letter cited several examples of price gouging related to coronavirus, including prices of hand sanitizer and face masks.

The Hill has the story, here.

Posted by Allison Zieve on Thursday, March 26, 2020 at 05:53 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

CFPB: Protecting your finances during the Coronavirus Pandemic

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has posted Protecting your finances during the Coronavirus Pandemic.

Posted by Brian Wolfman on Thursday, March 26, 2020 at 11:49 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wednesday, March 25, 2020

Can ProctorU Be Trusted With Students' Personal Data?

One of the hard lessons that I have learned over my years of practice is that, although some lawyers believe that they can increase the in terrorem effect of a complaint or a demand letter by piling on claims, the net effect of adding silly assertions can be to make things worse for your own client and not better.  That may be true as well of the demand letter recently sent by David Vance Lucas of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings on behalf of their client, ProctorU.

ProctorU logo

Criticisms and Demand Letter

The saga begins with a faculty association at the University of California at Santa Barbara, which heard about a potential problem with the data-sharing policies of ProctorU, a business that provides internet-based test monitoring services. The group took a look at the ProctorU privacy policies and did not like what they saw – in their view, it provided too little specificity about the limitations on data-sharing, and no protection for the data in the event that ProctorU were to go into bankruptcy or merge, possibly without restrictions on use of the data. And online discussions by students subject to ProctorU monitoring have shared a variety of concerns about the creepy nature of ProctorU’s interventions; the students were plainly worried about the attending possibility of data accumulation. The faculty association voiced its concerns in a letter to the leadership of the University of California at Santa Barbara, urging them to stop using ProctorU and to avoid using “any other private service that either sells or makes students’ data available to third parties.” The letter was discussed in a story in the school’s student newspaper.

Continue reading "Can ProctorU Be Trusted With Students' Personal Data?" »

Posted by Paul Levy on Wednesday, March 25, 2020 at 07:43 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)

Thursday, March 19, 2020

Bloomberg: Bill would require credit bureaus to stop listing negative items during pandemic

by Jeff Sovern

Evan Weinberger reports here. The bill's text is not yet available at Govtrack. I wonder if the bill would also apply to consumers who have not lost their jobs or had hours cut back because of the pandemic, and if so, what incentives it would create for them. 

Posted by Jeff Sovern on Thursday, March 19, 2020 at 05:20 PM in Consumer Legislative Policy | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wednesday, March 18, 2020

AFT and SBPC Student Loan Repayment Webinar

The Student Borrower Protection Center (SBPC) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) are co-hosting a webinar focusing on student loan repayment during the coronavirus pandemic. More information and registration here.

Posted by Jeff Sovern on Wednesday, March 18, 2020 at 04:43 PM in Student Loans | Permalink | Comments (0)

Norm Silber: Consumers should use their gift cards in light of the coronavirus

Hofstra's Norm Silber, who studied gift cards and other merchant cash substitutes for his article, Merchant Authorized Consumer Cash Substitutes, 14 University of Virginia Law & Business Review (2019), urges consumers to spend their gift cards online. He points out that

[A] gift card always involves insolvency risks, but the problem has never been as serious as it is now-- in the case of the coronavirus pandemic.  When consumers buy gift cards, they are usually making unsecured loans at zero interest to retailers. 

In 2015, they loaded $5 billion on to Starbucks cards, for example, a number has grown since then. The average consumer last year had outstanding loans to retailers that have been estimated at about $214.   A list of the popular gift cards includes many that are in little or no apparent danger; but there are many that may well be, especially if the imperatives of social distancing continue into the summer and fall—which appears extremely likely, sitting here now. 

Here is a list published not long ago in a WalletHub report:

Target; Walmart; Sephora; eBay; Home Depot; Ikea; iTunes; Starbucks; Costco; Chick-Fil-A; Netflix McDonald's; Fandango; Chipotle; Rei; Old Navy; H&M; Disney; Google Play; Best Buy; Macy’s; Lowe’s; Subway; Amazon; Gamestop; Nordstrom; Nike; Kohl's; T.J. Maxx; Apple Store; Cabelas; Visa; Ticketmaster; Whole Foods; Forever 21; Applebees; Olive Garden; Taco Bell; American Airlines; JCPenney; Texas Roadhouse; Red Lobster; Cinemark; Michaels; American Express; Mastercard; Dunkin Donuts; Hobby Lobby; Etsy; Shell

My suggestion is for consumers to spend their gift cards online—and as soon as possible in the case of companies whose profitability depends on social intimacy.  Doing so will also help the retailers.

Posted by Jeff Sovern on Wednesday, March 18, 2020 at 04:36 PM in Consumer Law Scholarship | Permalink | Comments (0)

Older »

Subscribe to CL&P

RSS/Atom Feed

To receive a daily email of Consumer Law & Policy content, enter your email address here:

Search CL&P Blog

Recent Posts

  • My latest paper: Not-So-Smartphone Disclosures
  • Maryland seeking applications for consumer law endowed faculty position
  • FTC issues ANPR on consumer privacy and data security
  • Today at the CFPB
  • Cal Chief Judge calls for stronger oversight of "private judging," after scandal involving JAMS
  • Maybe it's the Chamber that needs to be held accountable: comments on their ad attacking the CFPB
  • Bruckner & Ryan paper compares complaints about fintech and traditional student loan lenders & servicers
  • GOP legislators accuse CFPB of colluding with states, as Kraninger did
  • WSJ: Equifax Sent Lenders Inaccurate Credit Scores on Millions of Consumers
  • Unfairness and Disparate Effects
  • CFPB analysis of potential impacts of medical debt credit reporting changes
  • OCC CFP: THE IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY FOR BANKING
  • Dan Solove gives the pending privacy bill a B+ but pans preemption
  • Paper responds to Wilf-Townsend's Assembly-Line Plaintiffs
  • CFP: Berkeley Consumer Law Conference
  • The National Consumer Law Center is hiring a LITIGATION DIRECTOR
  • WSJ: CFPB working on guidance to force banks to cover more scams on Zelle and similar apps
  • Consumer law and the "major questions" doctrine
  • Will Congress pass an online privacy bill?
  • Distracted driving kills thousands of people every year
  • Chao paper suggests unjust enrichment claims confer standing, even after TransUnion
  • CFPB issues advisory to protect privacy when companies compile personal data
  • Regulators fine BofA $225 million over botched disbursement of unemployment benefits
  • Consumer protection and the Supreme Court's new "major questions doctrine"
  • CFPB moves to reduce fees charged by debt collectors
  • Vijay Raghavan Essay: Shifting Burdens at the Fringe
  • FTC sues Walmart for facilitating money transfer fraud
  • CFPB affirms states' ability to police credit reporting markets
  • Can you solve the mystery of why the Credit CARD Act treats penalty fees differently from penalty interest rates and other fees?
  • CFPB Spring Regulatory Agenda is up and arbitration isn't on it
  • CFP: CFPB consumer finance research conference
  • My Daughter’s @Delta Disaster Story: The Last Chapter (I hope)

Categories

  • Advertising
  • Arbitration
  • Auto Issues
  • Book & Movie Reviews
  • Books
  • CL&P Blog
  • CL&P Roundups
  • Class Actions
  • Conferences
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
  • Consumer History
  • Consumer Law Scholarship
  • Consumer Legislative Policy
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Consumer Product Safety
  • Credit Cards
  • Credit Reporting & Discrimination
  • Debt Collection
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Food and Nutrition
  • Foreclosure Crisis
  • Free Speech, Intellectual Property & Consumer Issues
  • Global Consumer Protection
  • Identity Theft
  • Internet Issues
  • Law & Economics
  • Other Debt and Credit Issues
  • Predatory Lending
  • Preemption
  • Privacy
  • Student Loans
  • Teaching Consumer Law
  • Television
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Unfair & Deceptive Acts & Practices (UDAP)
  • Web/Tech
  • Weblogs

Archives

  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021

August 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31