In response to the Supreme Court's recent ruling in West Virginia v. EPA, the National Consumer Law Center has written Impact of Supreme Court’s “Major Question Doctrine” on Consumer Litigation. Read it here.:
Coordinators
-
Allison Zieve
Public Citizen Litigation Group - Jeff Sovern
St. John's University School of Law -
Brian Wolfman
Georgetown University Law Center and Harvard Law School
Other Contributors
-
Richard Alderman
University of Houston Law Center -
Paul Bland
Public Justice -
Stephen Gardner
Consultant -
Mike Landis
US Public Interest Research Group -
Paul Alan Levy
Public Citizen Litigation Group -
Scott Nelson
Public Citizen Litigation Group -
Ira Rheingold
National Association of Consumer Advocates -
Jon Sheldon
National Consumer Law Center
About Us
The contributors to the Consumer Law & Policy blog are lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. The blog is hosted by Public Citizen Litigation Group, but the views expressed here are solely those of the individual contributors (and don't necessarily reflect the views of institutions with which they are affiliated). To view the blog's policies, please click here.
Blogs On Consumer Issues
Other Interesting Legal Blogs
- American Constitution Society Blog
- Balkinization
- Concurring Opinions
- The Conglomerate
- Electronic Frontier Foundation DeepLinks
- Empirical Legal Studies
- How Appealing
- Legal Theory Blog
- Mass Tort Litigation Blog
- Opinio Juris
- PrawfsBlawg
- Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log
- SCOTUSblog
- TortsProf Blog
- Trademark Blog
- Truth on the Market
- The Volokh Conspiracy
Consumer Law & Policy Links
- AAAP Foundation Litigation
- American Collectors' Association
- Americans for Financial Reform
- American Tort Reform Association
- American Association of Justice
- Center for American Progress
- Center for Justice and Democracy
- Center for Responsible Lending
- Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Center for Study of Responsive Law
- Consumer Action
- Consumer Federation of America
- Consumers Union
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- EU Consumer Policy Page
- Fair Arbitration NOW
- Federal Trade Commission
- International Association of Consumer Law
- National Association of Consumer Advocates
- National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
- National Community Reinvestment Coalition
- National Consumer Law Center
- Public Citizen
- State PIRGs
- Public Justice (formerly Trial Lawyers for Public Justice)
- Treasury Department, Regulatory Reform Agenda
- U.S. Chamber Legal Reform
- U.S. Public Interest Research Group
« Will Congress pass an online privacy bill? | Main | WSJ: CFPB working on guidance to force banks to cover more scams on Zelle and similar apps »
Tuesday, July 19, 2022
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Subscribe to CL&P
RSS/Atom Feed
Search CL&P Blog
Recent Posts
- My latest paper: Not-So-Smartphone Disclosures
- Maryland seeking applications for consumer law endowed faculty position
- FTC issues ANPR on consumer privacy and data security
- Today at the CFPB
- Cal Chief Judge calls for stronger oversight of "private judging," after scandal involving JAMS
- Maybe it's the Chamber that needs to be held accountable: comments on their ad attacking the CFPB
- Bruckner & Ryan paper compares complaints about fintech and traditional student loan lenders & servicers
- GOP legislators accuse CFPB of colluding with states, as Kraninger did
- WSJ: Equifax Sent Lenders Inaccurate Credit Scores on Millions of Consumers
- Unfairness and Disparate Effects
- CFPB analysis of potential impacts of medical debt credit reporting changes
- OCC CFP: THE IMPLICATIONS OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY FOR BANKING
- Dan Solove gives the pending privacy bill a B+ but pans preemption
- Paper responds to Wilf-Townsend's Assembly-Line Plaintiffs
- CFP: Berkeley Consumer Law Conference
- The National Consumer Law Center is hiring a LITIGATION DIRECTOR
- WSJ: CFPB working on guidance to force banks to cover more scams on Zelle and similar apps
- Consumer law and the "major questions" doctrine
- Will Congress pass an online privacy bill?
- Distracted driving kills thousands of people every year
- Chao paper suggests unjust enrichment claims confer standing, even after TransUnion
- CFPB issues advisory to protect privacy when companies compile personal data
- Regulators fine BofA $225 million over botched disbursement of unemployment benefits
- Consumer protection and the Supreme Court's new "major questions doctrine"
- CFPB moves to reduce fees charged by debt collectors
- Vijay Raghavan Essay: Shifting Burdens at the Fringe
- FTC sues Walmart for facilitating money transfer fraud
- CFPB affirms states' ability to police credit reporting markets
- Can you solve the mystery of why the Credit CARD Act treats penalty fees differently from penalty interest rates and other fees?
- CFPB Spring Regulatory Agenda is up and arbitration isn't on it
- CFP: CFPB consumer finance research conference
- My Daughter’s @Delta Disaster Story: The Last Chapter (I hope)
Categories
- Advertising
- Arbitration
- Auto Issues
- Book & Movie Reviews
- Books
- CL&P Blog
- CL&P Roundups
- Class Actions
- Conferences
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- Consumer History
- Consumer Law Scholarship
- Consumer Legislative Policy
- Consumer Litigation
- Consumer Product Safety
- Credit Cards
- Credit Reporting & Discrimination
- Debt Collection
- Federal Trade Commission
- Food and Nutrition
- Foreclosure Crisis
- Free Speech, Intellectual Property & Consumer Issues
- Global Consumer Protection
- Identity Theft
- Internet Issues
- Law & Economics
- Other Debt and Credit Issues
- Predatory Lending
- Preemption
- Privacy
- Student Loans
- Teaching Consumer Law
- Television
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Unfair & Deceptive Acts & Practices (UDAP)
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
What an interesting post! I'm interested in finding out who will be the proponent of using electronic health records. Medical Billing Services are really cutting-edge that would be helpful to the healthcare industry. Without the need for photocopies and faxes, insurance companies would have an accurate copy of the medical records. Doctors who carry their files with them while working on patients might benefit from electronic health records. The best and most complete platform for their patients would be a mobile device. Romney needs to at least research EHRs, in my opinion, if he intends to undo Obamacare.
Posted by: Medical Billing | Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 08:05 AM