David Lazarus of LA Times explains here why there should be more disclosure of car rental fees. Lazarus has also done a short video on the subject.
David Lazarus of LA Times explains here why there should be more disclosure of car rental fees. Lazarus has also done a short video on the subject.
Posted by Brian Wolfman on Thursday, December 15, 2011 at 06:21 PM | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)
The National Transportation Safety Board has called for all states to ban all non-emergency use by drivers of cell phones and other personal electronic devices. NTSB's recommendation extends to all PEDs, whether hand-held or hands-free. The NTSB does not have authority to impose this policy by regulation, but its views are often held in high regard by federal and state policy makers.
Posted by Brian Wolfman on Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 05:57 PM | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Here. But consumer advocates say it isn't over yet, at The Hill's On the Money Blog.
Posted by Jeff Sovern on Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 04:03 PM in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The National Consumer Law Center says that "[a]s for-profit post-secondary schools have rapidly expanded throughout the United States, state government has frequently failed to challenge for-profit school abuses and fraud." In this comprehensive report, NCLC explains the states' failings in detail and what they can do to curb the abuse and fraud. Go to the report's home page, which includes an executive summary, NCLC's press release, and the types of relief from fraud or abuse students may seek on a state-by-state basis.
Posted by Brian Wolfman on Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 12:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
by Jeff Sovern
He said it on Meet the Press. You can watch it here; you can also find coverage here and here. His claim seems to be based on the Bureau's having a director rather than a commission and not being subject to the congressional budgetary process. Exactly like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which Republicans seems to have no problems with. Could the difference be that the banks have captured the OCC and not the Bureau? Incidentally, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, among industries commercial banks are the eleventh largest contributor to Graham, while "miscellaneous finance" rank thirteenth.
Posted by Jeff Sovern on Monday, December 12, 2011 at 01:40 PM in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Consumer Legislative Policy | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has drafted what it believes is a simple, easy to understand agreement that will aid consumers in deciding whether to apply for a credit card and make credit terms more transparent. The agency says that the agreement "is not a model form, and use is not mandatory. ... We believe our approach will help consumers better understand their credit card agreements."
You can provide your comments to the CFPB at the bottom of this version of the agreement. You may want to compare the CFPB's agreement with the agreements currently used by credit card issuers.
Michelle Singletary has written this article about the CFPB's efforts and explains that the new agreement is being used in a pilot project by the Pentagon Federal Credit Union.
Posted by Brian Wolfman on Monday, December 12, 2011 at 08:38 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Here is something that may be interesting to consumers. Lowe's, the big-box home and hardware store, sponsored a cable TV reality show called "All-American Muslim." According to the LA Times, the show "chronicles the lives of five families in Dearborn, Mich., a Detroit suburb with a large Muslim and Arab American population." The Florida Family Association, an organization that pressures companies to stop sponsoring programming that it doesn't like, campaigned to get Lowe's to pull its ads from "All-American Muslim." And Lowe's caved.
Read the whole LA Times article here. The Florida Family Association suggests that it has caused 65 companies to pull their advertising from the program.
Posted by Brian Wolfman on Monday, December 12, 2011 at 08:15 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Economist Nancy Folbre argues here that the 1996 Clinton-era welfare reform legislation -- which generally provides only short-term cash assistance while a parent is seeking work -- does not jibe with an econony, like the current U.S. economy, mired in chronic high unemployment. She says, therefore, that . . .
Welfare reform is in dire need of … reform. A bill recently introduced by Representative Gwen Moore, Democrat of Wisconsin, the Rewriting to Improve and Secure an Exit Out of Poverty Act, would provide permanent funding, modify work requirements so that education and training would qualify, and guarantee child care for ... work-eligible recipients [under the current law].
The 1996 reform was based on a supposed need to develop a work ethic among poor people. Ms. Folbre concludes, however, "[a] work ethic doesn’t help much when there is no work to be had."
Posted by Brian Wolfman on Monday, December 12, 2011 at 08:02 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Ruben Hernandez-Murillo
of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis,
Andra C. Ghent
of Baruch College (CUNY) - Zicklin School of Business, and
Michael Owyang
also of the St. Louis Federal Reserve have written Race, Redlining, and Subprime Loan Pricing. Here is the abstract:
We investigate whether race and ethnicity influenced subprime loan pricing during 2005, the peak of the subprime mortgage expansion. We combine loan-level data on the performance of non-prime securitized mortgages with individual- and neighborhood-level data on racial and ethnic characteristics for metropolitan areas in California and Florida. Using a model of rate determination that accounts for predicted loan performance, we evaluate the presence of statistical and taste-based discrimination, as well as disparate impact and disparate treatment discrimination, in mortgage rates. We find evidence of redlining as well as adverse pricing for blacks and Hispanics.
Posted by Jeff Sovern on Saturday, December 10, 2011 at 09:00 PM in Consumer Law Scholarship, Credit Reporting & Discrimination | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Here. Paul is a colleague of mine. Here's an excerpt:
In this year of nonviolent resistance, at least some lower courts seem to be engaging in a protest of sorts, seeking ways to avoid the inevitable logic of the recent decisions, especially Concepcion. Not surprisingly, California leads the resistance. For example, in its recent decision in Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co., the California Court of Appeal invalidated an arbitration agreement containing a class waiver in a used car contract on unconscionability grounds, finding that the agreement was a contract of adhesion and unfairly one-sided (the court focused on a variety of terms besides the class-action waiver). And in Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., the California Court of Appeal invalidated a class-action waiver in an arbitration agreement as applied to a representative action under California’s Private Attorney General Act, which allows a plaintiff to bring an action on behalf of other employees to enforce the Labor Code, in the process distinguishing representative actions from class actions.
Posted by Jeff Sovern on Friday, December 09, 2011 at 01:39 PM in Arbitration | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)