It's time for another roundup of recent New York Times articles on consumer law, including some articles that don't have anything to do with the mortgage crisis. On Sunday, the Times ran a piece on cars that had been declared lemons but that were nevertheless resold without being so designated. An excerpt:
To see what happens to lemons, Experian Automotive, which specializes in collecting and analyzing automotive data, picked at random 1,000 Florida vehicles that were branded lemons, from a list on a state Web site. Experian found that 555 had been taken out of the state. And four-fifths of those 555 cars no longer had titles branding them as lemons, according to an analysis conducted for The New York Times.
The article also notes that some states require that lemons be so labeled, discusses litigation by those who have unwittingly purchased such lemons, reports on the FTC's failure to act, and quotes consumer advocates as suggesting a national database of lemons is needed.
Today's paper included a report on nonprofit payday loans, while yesterday's included an editorial titled "The College Credit Scam" in which the Times called upon colleges that allow credit card issuers to solicit students on campus to take steps to protect vulnerable students, an issue that is highlighted in the documentary "Maxed Out." The editorial concluded "Congress, when it convenes next week, should move forward with planned legislation that would tighten federal supervision over the credit card industry while improving disclosure laws and outlawing deceptive practices."
But the mortgage meltdown has also come in for its share of attention. Last Friday the Times reported here on state statutes intended to limit the damage from subprime lending. North Carolina, Maine, Minnesota, and Ohio have enacted such statutes and other states are considering them. And an article in today's paper reports on possible federal responses to the problem.